From The National Council for Incarcerated Women and Formerly Incarcerated Women and Girls:
Most people agree on the basic idea of restitution. If someone causes harm, they should be required to make it right. Return what was taken. Cover medical bills. Repair the damage. In theory, restitution is meant to prioritize accountability and repair over punishment. It was designed as a system meant to make people whole.
In practice, it rarely does.
A recent report from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers shows how far the U.S. restitution system has drifted from that goal. What was created to make people whole now often functions as another layer of punishment. The report identifies serious problems, including weak due-process protections, payment rules that disregard a person’s ability to pay, and enforcement practices that deepen harm rather than repair it. Regardless of where one falls in debates over punishment or rehabilitation, one basic question remains unanswered: Where does the money actually go?
From Continue reading
|
|
|
|
