From
The Sentencing Project:
Despite their many flaws, juvenile courts are better for youth who break the law than are adult courts. Contrary to critics’ beliefs, juvenile courts regularly address serious and violent crimes. Juvenile courts do not offer a “slap on the wrist;” they often issue harsh punishments. The frequent alternative, sending youth to adult courts, is a dangerous and counterproductive response.
Introduction
Teenagers value risk-taking but struggle to weigh the consequences of their actions.1 Temple University psychologist Laurence Steinberg has described the teenaged brain as “a car with a sensitive gas pedal and bad brakes.”2 Adolescence offers a welcoming platform for lawbreaking. Efforts to reduce offending and reoffending by young people must start with the understanding that teenagers are different from adults.
Fortunately, youth offending — lawbreaking as measured by arrests3 and self-reported behavior4 — has dropped considerably this century. Crime has fallen overall, and a shrinking proportion of it is committed by youth. Between 2000 and 2024, the proportion of all arrests that involve people under 18 has fallen by more than half, from 15% to 7%.5 Still, more than 650,000 arrests landed in juvenile courts in 2023,6 in addition to the cases of youth who violated the terms of their probation or committed a status offense.7
Public understanding of both crime trends and what follows a teenager’s arrest is battered by misinformation, anecdotes, and ignorance. Moreover, the juvenile justice system values confidentiality and utilizes a vocabulary that masks its purposes and outcomes. It’s easy to be confused.
Continue reading >>>
|
|
|
|
